Oct 192014

In truth, the Tories were right: we are all in this together.  And we are all better together.

The problem is they don’t really believe what they say, but – at the same time – what they say is what we ought to say.

A dependence society is bad for everyone concerned: individuals, whether we are “healthy” or not; companies and businesses, whether we are big- or small-scale.  To scrounge a living on the backs of others is about as un-human as anyone can get: the glory of “being” surely lies in proactivity, not the kind of inactivity that relying unnecessarily on others can lead to.

It doesn’t make any difference whether you defraud pennies or billions of pounds: it’s primarily the mindset which is wrong here.  One thing, then, that is broadly shared, I can tell you, is this mindset of something for nothing I describe.  That’s how we’ve been taught to think over the past thirty years.  That’s what “greed is good” does to you.

Yes.  The Tories were right.  In what they said.

The Tories were, however, wrong.  In what they did.

If Labour is looking to see what its next manifesto should really contain, it could do far worse than to take Tory platitudes; give them to our most dedicated (ie humane) socialists; and turn them into properly burnished policies – policies which impact on everyone, in what we would like to call society.

Always assuming that more radical change to our structures is no longer possible short-term, the kind of government we need runs as follows:

  1. A leader like any half-decent philosopher out there – let’s call them HDPh for ease of use – who is able to identify the essence of what makes us happy human beings, and then enable and facilitate the changes and direction we’re all looking for.
  2. A communications tsar like Cameron himself (though please never like IDS, Gove or Boris), able to form and trot out the platitudes we all want to believe in, but which – for a number of years – we’ve failed (for good reason) to believe he believes in.
  3. A second-in-command policy-adviser type like Ed Miliband himself (though please never like those beloved of the so-called Blue Labour clique), able to identify and stand up to the big issues of the day before anyone else has the guts or nous to do so, and then define a proactive response that lives up to the needs of our peoples.  (Needless to say, communication of the latter would be the responsibility of the communications tsar.)

As you can see, no further justifications are required: we are in it – and better – together.

The only problem I can see is that no political party, nor leading light, cares to do just what they’re best suited to; all of them want to be uniquely responsible for making a mess of our lives.

HDPh-type, where are you?


Obesity and the Four Hoarse Men (with apologies to Jonathan Freedland)

No.  I’m not very good at titles.  You may have realised that already. This post is not really about obesity at all.  It’s written out of ignorance – as well as a reluctance to make myself seem more learned than I am by spending five minutes Googling statistics held online. A couple of days ago, [...]

How a Freud can’t help saying exactly what he thinks … obvious, ain’t it?

And a Freud of this nature is so bound to be a he, don’t you think? First this: Conservative welfare reform minister Lord Freud is facing calls to be sacked from the Government for saying that disabled people are “not worth the full wage”. [...] Then, as ampp3d suggests, Freud’s own calculations suggest he may [...]

Ebola and surveillance’s perfect storm

We’ve been told a lot over the past couple of years or so about how we’ve already been living a surveillance society. The implications are considerable: from inhabiting an environment and nation – the United Kingdom, I mean – where volunteering information, time and resources has always been prized highly to a democracy where almost [...]

Motorcycle Crime

Here’s a real, awfully truthful story* – something which happened to our family this weekend. I first made reference to it in my previous blogpost. Probably made 75-100 phonecalls yesterday – a bit traumatic indeed. Offspring’s motorbike had front brake line cut on Friday by vandals, whilst parked outside a university in a large northern [...]

Four tweets, two situations, one thought

Four tweets, two situations, one thought.  That’s how I see the world this morning. The first two tweets are on how our governing coalition of Tories and Liberal Democrats has presumably, quite suddenly, recovered its appreciation of the National Health Service, as it frantically casts assurances to the wind and our evermore cynical ears: In [...]

The Guardian: from the corrosive relativism of CiF to recovering the soul of civic progress

A while ago I had this to say about the hollow empire that once was Rupert Murdoch’s – and how I felt that the Guardian, in its page-impression-chasing “Comment is Free” section had reproduced such hollowness, perhaps quite despite itself. The corrosive relativism – that platform for anyone, even one’s enemies (which, as you can [...]

Inequality and why we need to deal with it

Some good quotes today – and, I would argue, patterns that weave a little worryingly. This first one came via Tom on Facebook, from a nice overview of New Labour times in Left Foot Forward: And yet the New Labour preference for equality of opportunity over equality of outcome failed to recognise that it isn’t [...]

How alien our inalienable rights are becoming

As usual, I’m late to the party.  Perhaps that’s the point.  Perhaps the purpose of our body politic is not to embrace us out of a kindly desire to inform but bear-hug us into confusion – and, ultimately, inaction too. I naively thought all rights have their corresponding responsibilities.  In theory, however, it gets much [...]

Customer service is (unhappily)

I was going to title this post, a tad ironically: “Customer service isn’t” – but I didn’t.  For if truth be told, customer service unhappily is – it’s just that the customer in question is not ourselves. When we get to the point that the big news of the day is that the Prime Minister [...]

On Scottish independence – and that united kingdom, mislaid

Ben said this yesterday (the bold is mine): To me, the Scots Independence debate seems to have shown a yearning not so much for separation, but rather for a state and a country that means something – for a better democracy. I think we can (and definitely should) all share that aspiration, but the idea [...]

Biz news

As promised, I’ve been working hard on my biz – as befits this time of year.  Although, when working in an online environment, academic years and timeframes seem to mean less and less. Here’s what I’ve been doing.  First, this blogpost where I announce for the price of six hours of personalised classes that you [...]

Home is where you were born; but also where they really love you

The following is something I wrote this weekend in moments of doubt.  I don’t know if it bears sharing with a wider audience, or whether such sharing is, in truth, an unworthy baring instead. You must be the judge of this; I can only continue to question what the world delivers in its curious and [...]

What do we mean when we say we are “pro-job creators”?

This tweet led me to this Labour Party YouTube video: http://youtu.be/2CyHZh10nro Before I continue, let it be clear from the start that whilst I’m still currently a Labour Party member, its behaviour during the recent #DRIP process has meant I will be deciding in September whether to continue to pay my dues.  I am as [...]