Dec 142012
 

I love WordPress to bits – but one thing I don’t like is its updating process.  When a new version comes along, you’re immediately urged to “Please update now” – and then you are faced with the knowledge that they also cover themselves (not always in glory) with exhortations to first make back-ups of files and stuff.  Doesn’t really infuse one with confidence – especially when you’re a non-techie sort of person as myself.

It’s almost as if you have to take your life in your hands; almost as if you have to do so unnecessarily.

Perhaps, in that sense, WordPress is like life itself.  Sometimes, in life, you have to take that risk.  You have to run the risks of an update.

Anyhow.  Two are now due.  One is the theme I use: Suffusion.  Lovely piece of work, but I guess it’s time to make sure I can take advantage of stuff the market seems to be demanding – responsive technologies and stuff like that.

The other is WordPress itself.  I’ll be updating the theme first, and then updating our life-risking WordPress.

If I disappear from your screens this weekend, this’ll be the only reason.

*

By the by, I’m a little sad at the moment.  You may have sensed this.  I was with my MP this morning in relation to the work done recently by the Joint Committee on the Communications Data bill – a committee on which he sat.  I wrote about the whys and wherefores of this appointment yesterday on my site http://error451.me.

The meeting was OK, cordial and reasonably informative, but I did get the impression that Internet freedoms and their importance for our future ingenuity, imagination, creativity and human industry are not sufficiently recognised in Parliament – not even by those who worked on the Joint Committee in question.

Legislation creep will take place.

The same old reasons to make the state more oppressive – paedophiles, terrorists, the violent and the criminal – will continue to be trotted out by those who are terrified of devolving to communities the powers they would need in order to run themselves.  And so, just as with those wars on terror, the criminal elements will have succeeded in imposing the law of the jungle on our democracies.

Nothing updated – everything maintained.

Life in the spheres of casual and short-term power continues as always.

One point that my MP made – and I’m sure he won’t mind me mentioning it here – was that it was a good experience for him to have the opportunity of working on one subject over a period of six months.  So much of the job of an MP involves being here or there for ten or fifteen minutes.  Being able to get one’s teeth into something is surely what drives humans to better things.

Perhaps too much of our politics is superficially so.

Perhaps too much of the power that the powerful exert is made of such experiences.

If only we could create a society which was able to reflect on, and consider with the due thoughtfulness we know we are capable of, our shared human condition.  Instead of serving more and more to reflect our least attractive sides.

I unhappily tweeted this thought today:

@itiddly All I see is as a society we demand of our children virtues & ways of being that we refuse to demand of our adults. S’thing’s wrong

When a child’s rite of passage becomes that shabby discovery that their duty as an adult is to renege on everything they were taught in their youth is when we realise our society is much sicker than it ever was.

Yes.  Our politicians are often well-meaning – but so much gets lost by those who mean well; so much, in fact, has already been lost.

An example.  Ed Miliband has just spoken of the need to integrate non-English speakers into an English-speaking environment, especially where this allows a society to create a single sense of purposeful nation.  I wonder how he imagines this might happen in a society where the disabled, the working-poor, the sick and the unemployed English speakers who already live in our country find it impossible to find the integration they deserve.  If we can’t properly integrate those who were clearly born here, how can we possibly contemplate that integration he probably rightly proclaims we need for those who wish to come and live here?

And if we cannot even sustain the moral link between youth and adulthood – the cogent and coherent seamlessness that should lead us to build on solid foundations rather than throw away every lesson that every adult tries, a least for a while, to inculcate in their offspring – what serious hope do we have of creating a single society capable of answering the needs of everyone?

*

My MP is a privileged man – and I think it would be fair to say is unlikely to see too clearly beyond this privilege.  I can understand this; if I was in his position I would think the same.

Mr Miliband, meanwhile, is a child of immigration – that he has been able to climb the greasy pole practically to the top means it is hardly surprising he should feel all visitors who cross our borders and wish to make their homes here might go through the same integrating process he surely observed in his own home.

But, in a sense, Mr Miliband is as privileged as my MP.

Neither offers me more than a retread of very old battles.

Neither seems interested in truly updating our politics.

Neither seems interested in doing anything beyond a certain maintenance of a certain status quo.

Isn’t it time we all decided that the events which have brought us to where we are right now actually require us to do a WordPress?  Take a risk; see how it pans out; look to make some really game-changing plays.

Take those challenges.  Take those deep breaths.  Take those perhaps irreversible steps forwards.

We need those moves.

We need to do something radical.

We need to take our lives in our hands.

Because if we don’t, I suspect that by those very same hands – and as a species which once knew what a shared progress really meant – we will end up taking far too many lives of those we should otherwise have nurtured.

Too many lives which deserved much more – and much better – than this mess we still choose to permit.

Mar 232012
 

Not literally.  Perhaps I should say “spaces”, instead.  Or just, simply, blog domains and servers.

Google has always claimed to pride itself on allowing for portability of data.  Well.  That kind of took a hit when it imposed changes on Reader recently.  Then I had the following experience with Google Friend Connect.  It was announced, with plenty of time, that it would be removed from non-Blogger websites.  I have twenty followers on my old blog who I’ve never really bothered with Friend Connect newsletters.  Since, however, I was planning to move my domain and servers to an .org.uk legislation, I thought I might send them one final email to advise them of the change and offer them the opportunity to sign up to the new feeds.

Google may have announced it was going to allow Friend Connect to continue on Blogger – but in reality, at least in my case, the facility to send a newsletter no longer exists; and this, even before I put a redirect in the blog’s now classic template in question.  So no newsletter was possible – even though Google claimed that Friend Connect was still going to be operational on Blogger.

Operational to connect perhaps – but not to communicate …

Which brings me to the point of this post.  The redirect I’ve used allows me to pick up traffic from the old Google domain and servers and redirect it not just to the homepage of the new blog but to the exact same page the web user in question is looking for.  And it works quite fine.  Here, for the moment, whilst I still have the redirect in place, is an example I searched today using Google.  As you can see, it goes from 21stcenturyfix.org to 21stcenturyfix.blogspot.com, wherein the redirect kicks in so the reader is directed to the equivalent page on the site you now find yourself at.

But look what happens when you use the dynamic views link – which also, incidentally, comes up on the first page of a Google search for 21stcenturyfix.org.  Instead of taking you to the redirect code, it sidesteps it entirely and presents you with the original blog and all its content to the day I stopped.  Remember, I have asked for the old version of the blog not to be available to search engines any more and for all content requests to be redirected to the new domain name and servers.

It would seem therefore that Google’s famed portability of user data doesn’t cover the user’s right to decide how that data may be accessed in the future.

Now this may be a question of overstretched engineers simply not contemplating the impact of new technologies such as those that dynamic views represent on other bits of the system.  The redirect plugin I’m using is, after all, a third-party technology.  But I find it very difficult, in a world where people are leaving Blogger in droves, to accept there isn’t an intrinsic advantage in massaging the stats in favour of a Blogger version of a blog to the detriment of anything else a user and owner of content might wish to establish.

Anyone with more technical knowledge than myself know why this might be happening?  Or, indeed, how to stop it?

Mar 062012
 

There’s lots of bad stuff going on at the moment in the UK.  Like in many places I guess.

Too many people in positions of power who say they’re going to do one thing but do another.  Too many companies who landgrab private information, details and property for their own business purposes.  The market, life, society and the need to make a living all drive us competitively towards behaviours which most of us – in our right minds – would in other circumstances describe objectively as being quite disgraceful.

So I need some advice.  I need to feel, as my country of birth disintegrates before my eyes, that some of what I do and say is safely mine; is protected; is able to speak out freely without fear of intervention by those who occupy the previous paragraph.

I’m not happy, either, with what Google is progressively doing to all the discrete products it once used to happily house.  I don’t want my email and my blogging to be connected and communicating any more, for example.

That’s my choice, right?  My choice and decision.

This is why I’m looking to move my blog to the WordPress blogging platform.  And I’m debating whether to transfer the domain name over too or simply choose a different TLD (the bit after the dot part of a domain name) in order to do so – or maybe, maybe, a different domain altogether.

Perhaps, even, start from a kind of scratch.

I’ve already exported this blog to WordPress.com, where it is currently a private blog I am playing around with.  I like it too.  I’m just finding it difficult to find a way which would maintain active and unbroken all the links that now occupy and have strewn the Internet over the years.  It’s possible, everything is – just not very easy.  Instead of .html at the end of each URL, for example, there is simply a lazy forward slash.  I think the slugs work differently too.

You see, this blog means a lot to me – I’ve been looking at its very early posts over at WordPress.com, mainly just links with very short comments to interesting articles in the old manner of the web logging of yore, and it shows me a person who once believed in a much better world.  Maybe, at the time, it was.

In such a bad world as the one we now find ourselves in I need a space where I feel I can expound how I feel, without fear of contradiction or thought police.  I need this space; I need the room.

So it’s not something I wish to deactivate or let die on its legs.  I’d like to take over everything it has done and everything it currently is on the web to its new host.  I’d like a server in my own country or a country I know how to work with, a TLD I respect – and a sensation that what I write will not one day suddenly disappear from the airwaves for no given reason.

Can anyone suggest how this might be relatively easily and competently achieved?

I’m ready to listen and learn.

Nov 042010
 

Here’s an interesting idea from the hand of Luke Bozier:

We’ve finally released our free WordPress theme for local Labour parties today. Constituency Labour Parties face a problem when it comes to setting up a website; they can settle for the Labour WebCreator package, which can be costly and poor value for money (in design quality at least) or they can pay a designer or design company to set up a bespoke website. Or, the third option is to rely on a technically-minded CLP member to set up a site themselves.

He then goes on to tell us that:

The theme is completely free, our gift to the Labour community. If you or somebody in your CLP has the basic knowledge of WordPress, you simply download the theme zip package (link below) and install it.  [...]

As far as it goes, this is absolutely fine.  And the choice of technology is absolutely appropriate too.  But, as always with everything that is supposedly free, there is a catch – and it’s a pretty important one, if not insoluble.

I generally use Google’s Blogger platform for my blogs.  It’s not as sophisticated as WordPress and is probably far more suited to people starting out in the blogosphere.  But even for those of us who’ve been blogging for quite a while, it can have some advantages over its competitor.  One of them I discovered tonight, whilst following Bozier’s installation instructions.  These start out by telling us to:

1. Upload the LabourLocal theme to WordPress. Once this is done you’ll need to activate the theme in WordPress -> Appearance -> Themes

Under Blogger on Google’s servers this is an easy procedure to carry out – one I have done more than once and with completely satisfactory results.  Under WordPress on WordPress’s servers, this is actually entirely impossible.  On its support pages, WordPress explains that due to its infrastructures, uploading custom themes is not possible.  In order to do so you have to enable separate web hosting, the installation of the WordPress technology onto your contracted server and only then can you upload Bozier’s free LabourLocal theme and begin to use it.

Mind you, I’m not complaining.  Giving CLPs new to online media a cheaper option than the Labour Party’s own Web Creator has been a niche waiting to be exploited for the past few years.  And Bozier’s star product, £50 per year for the whole caboodle (hosting and installation included) (ie not free exactly), is actually very competitive. 

In fact, I’m really not sure why it’s taken this long. 

Maybe there’s some communications politics going on in the background that I’m unaware of. 

Maybe being in opposition for a few years will make us less elephantine and lumbering.

Maybe we can learn how to pick and choose our technologies with greater wisdom – and, indeed, feel we not only have the freedom but also the obligation to do so.

Personally, I’d prefer to use Blogger – I’ve even done a tryout myself here (if you’d like to see it, drop me a line and I’ll let you in on the secret!).  But I guess what’s really important now is the comfort that professional and independent hosting and installation can offer.  And Bozier’s about as professional as they come.

So.  May many more initiatives such as these flower to the benefit of left-wing politics.

For technology is most definitely the key – and a wider and more effectively public communication nexus the door we most definitely want to open.

Jul 132010
 

Here’s a lovely story from Tech Dirt on a move from the Guardian which – at least in my eyes – serves to redeem this curate’s egg of a newspaper for its mad and unyielding decision at the general election to go down the Lib Dem road.  More thus:

We’ve pointed out a few times that The Guardian newspaper in the UK is not just a believer in the value of keeping its content free online, but is also doing a lot of very interesting experiments. As we hear daily about newspapers and organizations like the Associated Press threatening to sue blogs that repost some of their content (even for commentary purposes), The Guardian is going in the completely opposite direction. As part of its Open Platform program, it has created a tool that lets any WordPress-based blog repost any Guardian article for free. Yes, this is the complete opposite of what most publications are doing. Rather than whining about “freeloaders” and “copycats” and “aggregators,” The Guardian has decided to embrace them and take advantage of the situation.

The full story here.

Contrast this with Murdoch’s paywall and the current British government’s moves to get rid of an unending list of regulations designed to protect us from the excesses of big corporations – and you most certainly have at least one reason to be moderately cheerful.

Knowledge is power.  Sharing knowledge means sharing power.

There is a future which shines brightly ahead of us, if we manage to work out how to fashion it.

No time now, but – perhaps – this evening I will link permanently to the Guardian and advertise this brilliant initiative.  Two requests.  A similar widget for the Blogger platform.  Plus a request to my favourite science magazine, New Scientist, to do the same.  Haven’t read it for months.  All stopped when it started telling me I could only read something like five articles a month.

What do you all say, moguls of the print world?  Is there room for more than one Guardian-style online network in this brave new world of interaction?