Apr 282013
 

This is what’s happening to Legal Aid.  Essentially, citizen access to due legal process is being dramatically reduced and gamed in favour of people and organisations with loads of dosh.

This is what’s happening to the NHS.  Essentially, patient access to due medical process and the right to doctor-patient privacy is being dramatically controlled and gamed in favour of people and organisations with lots of power.

This is what’s happening to our police.  Essentially, the subjects of this green and pleasant land are becoming just another monetised calculation in the deep pockets of transnational law-and-disorder.

This is what’s happening to our education system.  Essentially, the students and teachers of England are, both, becoming part of a secretive and overbearing experiment to change the ideological bent of society in the future.

And this is what’s happening to our social cohesion.  Essentially, the government – having failed in its attempt to impose a full quiver of mean-tested benefits through its attacks on the disadvantaged – now aims to shame the elderly well-off into giving up their rights. Attempting once again, this time at the other end of the spectrum, to achieve the aforementioned objective.

Essentially, old against young; rich against poor; sick against healthy … people like Iain Duncan Smith playing their favourite game of bloody divide and rule.

Essentially, what’s happening is that legal rights, health, policing, education and the ability of our society to band together are all being pulverised by the monetising ideology of those who run the world: those who have the time, energy, knowledge and resources to fill in forms, understand documents and read executive summaries.

Which ain’t going to be you or me.  Which ain’t going to be any of those who struggle in evermore precarious lifestyles to get to the end of the month.

Essentially, what’s happening is that our blessed unwritten constitution is being radically rewritten in the most underhand of ways.  No consultation.  No public recognition of their aims.  No voter awareness that the law, patient care, justice, learning and the socialising nature of humanity are being progressively re-engineered to fit “one best way” only.

To fit just one way.

Quite covertly, these people have analysed every significant centre of human liberation, of equal opportunity and of citizen empowerment which we’ve managed to fashion in the last sixty years.

And having done so, they’ve worked out how to dismantle each and every brick which made up those walls that served to protect us so – that served to protect us from the wolves.

The wolves that have never left the doors of poverty.

The wolves that now await each and every one of us.

This is a revolution conducted by a group of people who have burrowed into the very innards of the establishment.  They have turned it inside out as a hedonist may pick away at the meat of a lobster.  Rather pink and expensively pursued by the money-mad, this is the call to independence of the corporates.

Independence of ordinary people; independence of ordinary lawyers; independence of ordinary police officers; independence of ordinary health workers; independence of ordinary educationalists … independence, that is to say, of the general desire that societies have to work together.

Sounds a bit mad of me to suggest that this might be the case?  In truth, how else can we describe it?  If someone takes over your legal, health, police and education systems – as well as attempting to detonate the ability of a people to defend themselves judiciously as one – what could we call it if not a call for someone’s savage breaking away?

A breaking away, if you like, from all that England and the United Kingdom used to mean.

No wonder some Scots are burning to escape.

Who wouldn’t want to leave such a sorry state of constitutional hijack?

Mar 022012
 

Dave complains he’s being ignored in the European Union’s summit on jobs.  Dave clearly didn’t know what it was like to be ignored.  We do.

I’m glad Dave feels he’s not being taken into account.  Perhaps a taste of the medicine he so loves to dish out will finally do him some good.

Meanwhile, ignoring me is what he’s done on the NHS, on DLA, on free schools, on Legal Aid, on welfare reform, on digital rights, on News International, on Andy Coulson, on workfare and forests (for a while), on human rights legislation (surely pretty soon) – and on more or less everything that currently preoccupies me about this unfair and unpleasant land.

Which, I suppose, in a perverse kind of way, brings me closer to Dave than ever before.

The worst of it being, of course, than I’m really not sure if this ignorance of Dave’s is unintentional or fashioned.  Politicos these days are so clever – in full marketing mode – at selling their weaknesses as virtues that any virtues you perceive out there must automatically be discounted as weaknesses hidden by the cloak of clever obfuscation.

In short, Dave’s a passive-aggressive bully – and there’s nothing a passive-aggressive hates more than to be simply ignored.

Well done, European Union.  My faith in your judgement is beginning, very slowly, to be renewed!

Nov 222010
 

I saw Panorama this evening.  It was on the subject of how the Saudi authorities, through their cultural institutions, their educational materials, their national curriculum and via their embassy here in the UK, are essentially poisoning British schoolchildren’s minds through part-time educative actions carried out after normal school hours in some cases and in hired state schools in others. 

The documentary showed us official Saudi textbooks teaching young children exactly where hands and feet would need to be cut off as punishments for assorted crimes – and in accordance with traditional Islamic teachings.

A pity the programme doesn’t currently seem to be on iPlayer.  You really ought to try and catch it some time.  It would open your eyes to the underbelly of religious faith.

I was never entirely sure of Blair’s policy of faith schools.  Choosing to learn from the good that those who profess a faith can constructively get up to in society is certainly laudable.  I know, from personal experience, how many kind people believe in God and – also – how many people who believe in God are kind.  Gentle is, in fact, the word that comes to mind when I think of the religious people I’ve come into contact with – quite a different word from the general tenor of all those views the Dawkins of this world would prefer to hold.  In the name of religion many unhappy acts have been committed, it is true.  But an intolerant expression of strongly held beliefs is not the preserve of the believer.  Disbelievers exhibit their own fair share too – whether rightly judged or not.

But there was something about faith schools, from their very inception, that seemed cock-eyed, misplaced and poorly defined.  On the one hand, there was this wonderfully overarching vision of Blair’s to place faith and its good works at the centre of our communities – and yet, on the other, Blair seemed to suggest that the best way forward in order to achieve this vision lay in dividing society into discrete layers of understanding.

And today’s Panorama shows us just how misconceived such a policy was, paving as it did the way for all kinds of educational bolt-ons – and freedoms to tinker – to enter our sociocultural mainstream.  But – in a way – this is now the least of our worries.  In the film, it was notable that on a number of separate occasions Michael Gove, one of the Coalition’s most eloquent and least coherent speakers, kept on underlining how xenophobia wouldn’t be allowed to have its place in the British education system – as Ofsted, the education inspection authority, would be encouraged to tighten up its procedures. 

And, as he did so, he kept referring to the English education system!

Incoherence is Gove’s personal trademark and stock-in-trade.  It was probably a slip of the tongue – or possibly an administrative exactitude.  Either way, it doesn’t bode well.  In times of welfare and public spending cuts, inspection processes usually go to the back of the queue.  A fragmenting education system, inherited from Blair’s faith schools legacy, is a clear example of how more inspection, not less, would be needed to ensure cogency.  Only more inspection is not what we’re going to get.

One of Mr Gove’s flagships is the equally misconceived “free” schools policy:

Free schools, founded by parents and teachers, are one of the government’s flagship ideas for reforming education in England. The schools will be run by private firms or charities when they start to open next year. As academies, they are state schools, but operate outside the local authority. They will be able to set their own curriculum and control their own admissions.

As we can see, the same damn fool mistake that Blair made with his faith schools policy is being repeated seven years later – here in a curiously secular manner – by the Coalition government.  As the Place Group organisation, an example of partnership organisations in such movements, underlines on its website:

Place Group has been deeply involved with the Free Schools movement since its inception and continues to be instrumental in advising and supporting Proposer groups in how they approach this challenge.

We were responsible for producing one of the first applications under this policy and are currently working with Proposer groups nationwide, including a number of the first Free Schools set to open in September 2011. These groups, led by inspirational community members, have chosen Place to support them in the journey to open their schools and to make them a success in the first year and beyond.

To achieve this high level of success, we have drawn on our experience in establishing over 40 Academies and many other major education projects, to ensure that the vision of each group is turned into an economic and educational reality. We continue to liaise with the New Schools Network and DfE on the challenges our groups are facing, and have also suggested refinements to the process. This knowledge and experience means we are ideally placed to advise on the skills, time and resources needed to successfully establish and run a new school.

Place understands that no two new schools are the same and that each reflects the vision and aims of the Proposer group. Our consultants will advise and guide you to establish a school that you want, rather than one that fits a pre-defined model. From the initial application through to the successful running of the school, we can provide expertise and access to partnerships that allow your group to concentrate on ensuring the governance and community aspects of the school remain at the fore.

And as it indicates on a news item published recently, the appointment of “visionary leaders” is key to ensuring that these “free” schools function:

The recruitment of a visionary leader is crucial to any school – and arguably, this appointment takes on even more significance when the position is as Head of a new Free School.

Place Group is managing the recruitment and selection of new Headteachers for both Stour Valley Community School and Haringey Jewish Primary School – and we are delighted to announce that the first provisional offer, for Haringey, has already been made.

Commenting on these assignments, New Schools Director for Place Tom Legge said, “Place Group has always had a strong reputation on Senior Leadership appointments in Academies. The skills required to recruit top talent for Free Schools are similar but require a real appreciation of the Proposers’ vision and the profile of the movement in general, both of which we are ideally positioned to offer.

We worked very hard to ensure that high quality candidates are attracted to these key roles – and we have been delighted at the level of interest and enthusiasm for the Free Schools movement, which has parallels with the early Academy appointments we made. There is a real sense of optimism and passion for change.”

Place expects to appoint its second Head Teacher designate for a Free School before the end of November.

Surely, though, we’ve had quite enough of the sort of damage that “visionary leaders” can bring to our society.  Surely we need a different approach.

For all of this seems quite wrong to me.  Education systems need to bring us together, not spin us apart.  Creating so many different layers of discrete practice seems to me entirely wrong, foolish and simply asking for future trouble.

We need a new way of doing education.  Not monolithic but – rather – binding.

And we need it now.

Before the afternoon bell rings awful changes on the age of cultural cohesion and respect.